It’s now much easier for Israeli soldiers to continue the occupation of Gaza sans settlers. What continues to beguile me is just what Hamas and Fatah are fighting over there, since “control” is not to be had so long as finance, construction, imports, exports, borders, etc. are not up for grabs. It is as former PLO advisor Diana Buttu said way back in February:

This battle is like two bald men fighting for a comb. They are not fighting for our national liberation or even for cleaner streets. In fact, it is not exactly clear what they are fighting for at all.

The Baqa’a Refugee Camp blogspot blog has some updates on the recent carnage and of the sort of unseemly notion of arming one side (Fatah, in this case) to keep the bloodshed going. This is a popular U.S. tactic that has seen the body counts rise in all sorts of places from Iraq to El Salvador.

If you want to reach a stable and durable Palestinian settlement you can’t do that by empowering one faction at the expense of the other, since you very much guarantee that the other faction, which is being marginalized, will seek to undermine any peace agreement.
— Mouin Rabbani, of the
International Crisis Group (ICG)


As for the great Iran specter in Gaza, much as in Vietnam, the US, thought it was involved in a proxy war while the locals were actually fighting for independence. Link

Tags: ,
Subscribe to comments Comment | Trackback |  

Browse Timeline


Related Entries




Site Map | Spam Poison | Archives | Contact | About | Creative Commonsω DREW3000. Now with more Open Sourciness.